Going, going, gone. Times nine.
Of the 10 properties in Middletown that have registered the most nuisance violations since 2013, nine have been demolished and replaced by grassy plots of land.
William and Jennifer Carter, who live across from where 717 Sixth Ave. used to stand, were glad when it disappeared.
“I think it’s fantastic,” William Carter said. “It’s a good thing. It wasn’t real shabby, but it was about to be. It was a haven for people to strip the property.”
“I’m real glad it’s down,” said Jennifer Carter, who hopes the city will work to pressure owners of another property on the block to improve that one.
Like dentists pulling infected teeth, city leaders hope to stem any slides in property values to the neighbors that could be caused by unsightly buildings or lots.
Some properties razed in recent years were crime havens, City Manager Doug Adkins told the Journal-News. Others were harbors for vandals, mold and rot.
“Each would have its own story,” Adkins said. “Some were crime and prostitution problems. Others were theft and break-ins. Others were simply decay, mold, broken windows, etc.”
“The demolition has left holes in the neighborhood, which long-term is a problem,” Adkins said. “The short term for us was that the properties were causing blight and crime problems with no one available to stop the slide. Houses that were marginal when they went into foreclosure sat vacant for 2-5 years and had roof leaks, mold, break ins, arson fires, theft of appliances, copper, etc, until they got to the point where it no longer made sense commercially to put the house back together again.”
“Said another way,” he added, “there was no reason to put $25,000-plus into a $50,000 house that was two bedroom, 80 years old, and that no one wanted to buy as a homeowner again.”
The exception in Middletown is the former Lincoln School at 2402 Central Ave.
The building “has forfeited to the State of Ohio and it is not in great shape,” Adkins said. “We’d probably assist in a renovation that made sense, but it may end up in demolition.”
A fire in early December last year at the former school was called "suspicious" by the city's fire chief.
‘It’s beautifying the town’
A list of the 10 properties with the most nuisance complaints in Hamilton since 2013 includes two buildings in the 900 and 1000 blocks of Maple Avenue, an area the city is targeting to reduce crime and blight. Those buildings haven't been torn down, but they both are next to ones that have been leveled in recent weeks.
The property at 905 Maple Ave. had the most complaints in the city, with 40, according to city Health Commissioner Kay Farrar. In most cases, violations are uncovered after complaints from neighbors.
Amy Dowler and others from Vickers Wrecking of Trenton worked this week to tear down the building next door at 917 Maple, with a fire hose in use to keep down dust and prevent fires amid the crunch of wooden rafters and the tinkle of breaking glass.
Dowler said she wonders who might have lived in these homes.
“You see kids’ names and kids’ toys, and you wonder how many families lived here,” Dowler said. “Or maybe this was Grandma’s house.”
Dowler said Vickers Wrecking has razed numerous buildings in the city.
“We’ll seed and straw, and make it a nice lot,” she said. “It’s beautifying the town.”
Carl Barger, who lives on the city’s West Side but is familiar with the Maple Avenue area, recalls decades ago when the house being torn down was very nice. The owners at the time “really kept it up,” he said, but younger people later moved in, and the property’s fate suffered.
“That’s a shame people tear these buildings up,” Barger said as he and his Dutch shepherd, Fella, watched an excavator vehicle rip the building down.
Newer homes, fewer problems
Compared to Middletown and Hamilton, West Chester Twp. and Fairfield tend to have newer homes in higher price ranges. The younger age and higher cost of those homes may be what translates to fewer nuisance violations.
West Chester Twp. is home to more than 23,000 housing units with more than 80 percent considered owner-occupied, according to Township Administrator Judi Boyko.
“In any given season, the township has to declare and process maybe one to two dozen properties as public nuisances, meaning more than 99.9 percent of West Chester’s properties are maintained to community standards,” she said.
“West Chester is fortunate residents tend to properly maintain and care for their property and hopefully continually invest in them to retain property values,” Boyko said.
In Fairfield, several properties had their lawns cut by the city because the owners weren’t doing so.
As Tanya Oler this week cut the lawn at her mother’s home on Lake Manor Drive in Fairfield, she said the grass next door “gets really, really high,” even though the city has it cut.
“It’s a nuisance, that’s for sure,” she said. The trees and bushes in the property’s back yard make it difficult to cut her mother’s lawn because they encroach through the fence, she said.
There seems to be good news for the neighborhood, though: A new roof has been installed on that home and a large trash container sat in the driveway this week, loaded with debris from inside the gutted house.
“This is the third (container) they’ve taken out of it,” Oler said during a break from lawn-cutting. “I’ll be glad when they’re done with it.”