She says they “hate” the speed traps and find it frustrating the case — that has been traveling around the Butler County and state appellate courts since 2013 — will be delayed even more.
“I feel like it’s a rip off,” she said. “We were going to fight it, it’s not right, it’s not fair, it makes me so mad, but by the time you get a lawyer to fight it and stuff, you might as well go ahead and pay it.”
One of the speeders’ attorneys, Josh Engel, said the village is putting the cart before the horse.
“This is premature,” Engel said. “With a few exceptions — not present here — a party can’t appeal decisions until the entire case is complete. In this case Judge Oster still has to set the final amount of restitution and deal with issues related to the distribution of funds to the class.”
RELATED: Judge asks for total fines paid
New Miami’s outside counsel James Englert said the timing of the appeal is in kind of a “gray area” in this case because he believes the only thing left for Oster to do is to issue an order to the village to pay the $3 million-plus judgment.
“We believe that we had no choice at this point but to file the appeal,” he said. “What we could not have happen was to not file at this point and then wait until there was a dollar amount assigned and then be looking at a motion to dismiss, because there already was a final judgment issued.”
Englert has said all along, especially with an Ohio Supreme Court decision that favors the speed camera process, they will prevail and that is why they continue to defend the case. The case was already appealed once to both the 12th District and high court, but only on the issue of class certification.
MORE: High court won’t hear speed camera case
Engel told the Journal-News they will ask the 12th District to dismiss the appeal.
“This is appeal is unlawful and we intend to ask the court to dismiss it immediately. This is yet another in a series of efforts by New Miami to delay their obligation to pay back motorists who paid fines under their unconstitutional scheme,” he said. “The rules of court prohibit filings for an improper purpose such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation. Yet this is what they are doing in this appeal.”