MORE: Mistrial declared after dad in scalding case gets sick in court
The court asked for a break and during that break, it was discovered the court reporter had mislabeled the testimony transcript, putting Massey’s name on it, when it was actually the testimony of another witness.
Schiavone III and Frank Schiavone IV asked for a mistrial.
Prosecutors declined to give an opinion until they had a chance to confer with others in the office.
On Tuesday, Assistant Warren County Prosecutor Steven Knippen said the prosecution opposed the mistrial motion.
Warren County Judge Robert Peeler said a mistrial was not warranted based on one witness.
Peeler asked Schiavone III why during cross examination in this trial he did not realize the transcript was not what Massey had said in the previous trials.
“Honestly judge no, I didn’t realize,” Schiavone III said. “That’s why we have transcripts … we depended on the transcript we received.”
Peeler said, “there was an error made and you didn’t catch it, right?”
Schiavone III answered, “I read the transcript, I accepted it as truth. There was noting to catch judge.”
After several more minutes of argument by Schiavone III, who asked that the court reporter testify about the mistake in a hearing, attorneys from both sides met in judge’s chambers for about 60 minutes.
When they returned to the courtroom, both sides agreed to a stipulation that the mistake that will be preserved for appeal evidence.
Peeler officially overruled the motion for a mistrial, and Ritchie’s trial is now moving forward.