The defense argued the prosecution has admitted it does not intend to keep it presentation of each offense “simple and direct.”
“Testimony regarding, but not limited to a lack of prenatal care, Ms. Richardson’s initial reaction to Dr. Andrew when she learned she was pregnant and Ms. Richardson’s decision to not tell anyone she was pregnant were all cited by the State on numerous occasions to this court and the Twelfth District Court of Appeals as evidence that it would use to try to meet its burden of proving aggravated murder, involuntary manslaughter, child endangering and abuse of a corpse.”
The defense also point to prosecution’s intention to use the identity of the biological father, Richardson’s internet research and browsing history and the fact that the labor occurred at Richardson’s residence in the middle of the night instead of a hospital all as evidence of multiple but separate offenses.
Warren County Prosecutor David Fornshell said the state will oppose the motion and will file a reply soon.
The defense argues that trying all the charges together would be prejudicial to Richardson.
There is “always a danger when several crimes are tried together, the jury may use the evidence cumulatively” and where evidence “upon any one of the charges might not have persuaded (the jurors) of accused’s guilt, the sum of it will convince them as to all,” the defense team wrote in the motion citing case law.
At Monday’s hearing, the defense attorneys and Assistant County Prosecutor Steven Knippen agreed that there had been no plea offers for the defendant, who is now 20.
Another pre-trial hearing was set for Aug. 19 ahead of Richardson’s scheduled trial on Sept. 3.
READ MORE: Supreme court won’t hear appeal in Carlisle buri9ed baby case