The appeal to the Supreme Court sought refunded charges for what the three parties argued were unlawful original charges.
Asked if such a request to revisit a ruling was unusual, J.P. Blackwood, an OCC spokesman, said: “The motion was filed in response to the court’s decision to not hear the customer groups’ appeal to protect Dayton-area consumers from higher electric rates and to bring to the court’s attention past precedent for allowing such appeals.”
Plaintiffs wanted relief because, they argued, DP&L kept $294 million that it already collected, even though the Supreme Court had earlier determined certain customer charges to be unlawful.
The legal case stretches back to June 2016, when the Ohio Supreme Court overturned a Public Utilities Commission of Ohio (PUCO) decision tied to DP&L, a decision that had allowed DP&L to charge customers extra so that DP&L could remain a “stable” operating entity.
About a month after that first Supreme Court ruling, DP&L asked the PUCO to withdraw its application for the plan that included those charges.
In a February 2017 appeal to the Ohio Supreme Court, the OCC said PUCO violated state law when it allowed DP&L to withdraw the application.
It was in response to that most recent appeal that the Supreme Court majority ruled that it’s not the court’s role to set electric utility rates.
MORE: Workers' lawsuit against Fuyao: What happens next?
“The effect of the court’s opinion is that DP&L and the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio … will avoid any consequence for disregarding an order of this court — and customers will be denied relief,” the three plaintiffs said Tuesday.
“The opinion also leaves DP&L’s customers harmed but without recourse after having been subjected to a transition charge that this court deemed to be unlawful,” they added. “As the concurring opinion notes, the effect of the court’s ruling is unfair and results in a windfall to DP&L.”
A DP&L spokeswoman said in an email with the utility is comfortable with the court’s original ruling.
A message seeking comment was sent to a Kroger representative.