‘The most logical and fair thing to do’

Keep Knightsbridge
11:59 a.m.
‘A start in the  right direction’
10:14 a.m.
Changing street names
3/18/10
Boehner is not serving his constituents
3/18/10
Two views on the Census
3/17/10
> More opinion headlines

1:55 PM Friday, December 18, 2009

Having looked at some of the e-mails, media reporting and other information relative to the recent (Hamilton City) Council election, I thought that I might add another view on the Ann Rowe debate.

The voters of Hamilton made their choice of the candidates who ran for council. I congratulate them on their election. Folks who have never held elected office do not realize the work and effort that goes into a campaign.

As a former mayor of Springdale, Ohio, and having served on committees for Hamilton County, OKI and the state of Ohio, and as a current Butler County businessman, I have seen how small, seemingly insignificant items become major issues during and after an election.

I have known Ann Rowe for many years. I have found her to be a dedicated, hard-working individual. She is very well known and respected in the real estate community and has always said that Hamilton is a great place to live and work, even when others were knocking the city. I know of no one who has a higher set of political ethics and values and a genuine love for the city of Hamilton. I recall she served the citizens of Hamilton very well while on council in the ’90s.

Most communities would automatically give the runner-up the seat that was being vacated by someone moving up to another position, be it mayor, council, county commissioner, state representative, etc. I would bet that if you ask the average Hamilton voter what he or she thinks should be done in this case, that they would say to appoint the next highest vote-getter to council. This is the most logical and fair thing to do. I would hope that the currently seated council would do the right thing and appoint Ann Rowe to the council seat.

After council has resolved this issue, should council wish to avoid this issue from happening in the future, they might consider having the charter revision committee review the charter and then revise the charter wording to address this issue and present it to the electors of Hamilton for a public vote as a charter amendment. This action would show the community that this current council is addressing the issue in a fair and impartial manner and giving the Hamilton voter a voice in solving the problem. Should the charter revision committee find other issues that have plagued other councils and administrations in the past, this would be a good time to review the entire charter and make appropriate changes.

Hamilton is the county seat of government for Butler County. Being the main city in the county brings with it certain responsibilities. The smaller communities need to be able to look at Hamilton as a model for how city government should be operated. The smaller cities and villages should be able to point to Hamilton and be proud of it as the county seat.

Ron Pitman

Springdale

Share this article

ADD COMMENT

Comments feed

Obviously Pittman is a friend of Rowe, how else is he seeing emails that have been sent in regards her quest to be seated. I also know Ann and I know that to all of her friends and associates she has made it clear that her main reason for running is for the health benefit coverage, not any interest to benefit Hamilton. The pick should be a person with a clear history of community involvement, not someone trying get benefits.

ReadWhatWasWritten
4:43 PM, 12/20/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Interested? Yes. But, dictating that his method is the right method oversteps. Maybe, we have had entirely too much of people who refuse to invest themselves in our city and far too many who merely spout advice and then leave. Maybe it is time to take our city back. Maybe, Veteran, you should take a look at how the city got this way in the first place. It comes from being open to everything without any idea of what our city is. Too many people trying to make us someplace else.

Jim
1:37 PM, 12/20/2009

REPORT ABUSE

Jim! Jim! Jim!
How parochial can you be? You seem to think that a Butler County businessman has no business being interested in Hamilton City Council politics? You might want to be sure to pull up your drawbridge whenever one outside your sphere has a thought that might contaminate.

Veteran
12:38 PM, 12/20/2009

REPORT ABUSE

On the one hand, he hopes that council will do the right thing by appointing the top loser in the race. On the other hand, he says that there is no right method for appointing a council member because the charter does not speak to the matter. Mr. Pitman is correct that there is no right thing to do here. But, the wrong thing would be for Hamilton to allow Springdale to tell us how to run our city. We need to get the best qualified person on council, not the most political one.

Jim
7:55 AM, 12/20/2009

REPORT ABUSE

We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.