The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.
Home  >  News  >  Local News

Fees for clean air, water needed, group says

Hot Topics

By Laura A. Bischoff, Staff Writer 1:19 AM Tuesday, June 23, 2009

COLUMBUS — Forty years after the Cuyahoga River caught fire the last time, environmentalists sounded the warning bell on Monday, June 22, by pleading with state leaders to boost landfill fees rather than put clean air and water programs at risk.

Gov. Ted Strickland proposed boosting municipal waste dumping fees to $4.75 per ton, up from the current $3.50 per ton, and construction waste dumping fees to $4.40 per ton, up from $1.70 per ton. The increases would help pay for Ohio Environmental Protection Agency programs.

But the GOP-controlled Senate stripped the fee increases out of the budget. State Sen. Keith Faber, R-Celina, said he views the fee increases as hidden tax hikes because landfill fees shouldn’t bear the burden funding EPA’s general programs.

“The EPA is a fee-based entity. They should have to tighten their belts like everybody else. Not just ask for more fees,” Faber said.

But Ohio Environmental Council Deputy Director Jack Shaner warned that without the fee increases, the progress made since Cleveland’s burning river days could be in peril.

“Ohio’s dire state budget outlook could put that steady progress for environmental clean up and natural resource conservation at risk,” Shaner said.

The Ohio EPA said without the fee increases the agency “will not be able to ensure compliance with drinking water regulations and more drinking water systems will face enforcement, many of which will be referred to U.S. EPA for enforcement. Ohioans will not have the same assurances of receiving safe drinking water.”

The state budget bill is pending before a House-Senate conference committee, which is trying to hammer out differences and come up with a balanced budget by July 1 when the new fiscal year begins.

Without the fee increases, Ohio EPA will have to cut dozens of staff who currently monitor air and water quality, assist small wastewater treatment plant operators, and help prevent pollution discharges into the air and water, the agency said.

The environmentalists aren’t alone in complaining about the state budget.

Nursing home operators are protesting proposed cuts in their Medicaid reimbursement rates as well as increased fees. Drug and alcohol abuse programs are sounding the alarm about what a proposed 28 percent cut in state funding would mean. And advocates for mentally ill Ohioans are concerned about a proposed 34 percent cut in state funding for community-based mental health programs.

Staff writer William Hershey contributed to this report.

So, basically, no matter what regulations are put on the books, you can always effectively get deregulation by not funding the regulators. Not much new here.
Kevin S.
3:26 AM, 6/23/2009
We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!



Comments are limited to 500 characters


500 character limit

Incorrect please try again


These words come from scanned books.
Entering them helps digitize old texts.


Breaking news by e-mail

Start your day with top headlines in your inbox and get breaking news e-mail alerts at any time by subscribing to our Headlines e-mail newsletter.

See Sample | Privacy Policy
View All

Top Jobs


About our ads

About our ads

Copyright © Sun Nov 22 09:59:46 EST 2009 Hamilton Journal-News, Hamilton, Ohio, USA.All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads. You may wish to note our other business policies.