The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.
Home  >  News  >  Election

Who’s telling the truth on casinos?

Hot Topics

State by state economic impact of commercial casinos
State by state economic impact of commercial casinos
The Ohio Newspaper Poll: Do you favor casinos
The Ohio Newspaper Poll: Do you favor casinos

Related

By Laura A. Bischoff, Staff Writer Updated 11:05 PM Saturday, October 24, 2009

W hen it comes to deciding how to vote on state Issue 3, it’s tough to cut through the confusing claims and counter-claims flying across the TV screen in 30-second bits.

The Dayton Daily News interviewed objective experts who monitor the gambling industry and asked them about what Ohioans should believe about the casino issue.

Eugene M. Christiansen, chief executive of Christiansen Capital Advisors; Clyde Barrow, professor of public policy at the University of Massachusetts, Dartmouth; and Lia Nower of the Center for Gambling Studies at Rutgers University each gave their views about jobs, taxes, and other issues.

Issue 3 would put one casino in Toledo, Cleveland, Columbus and Cincinnati. It’s backed by Penn National Gaming, which owns the Toledo Raceway and Hollywood Casino in southern Indiana; and Dan Gilbert, majority owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers. It’s endorsed by a number of unions and elected officials.

It’s opposed by the Ohio Council of Churches, Ohio Roundtable, U.S. Sen. George Voinovich, Progress Ohio and Truth PAC, which is funded largely by MTR Gaming.

Jobs

Proponents claim 34,000 jobs would be created — 19,000 temporary construction jobs and 15,000 permanent positions. Are these estimates accurate?

Barrow: “I thought that was a bit inflated based on the contours of the proposal.” Casinos typically employ 2,000 to 2,500 each, which would mean about 10,000 jobs for the four in Ohio, he said. He estimated the construction work would generate 2,000 jobs per casino for 18 to 24 months — a total of 8,000.

Nower: It’s unclear how many jobs may be lost as discretionary income shifts from other entertainment venues to the casinos.

Investment

Each casino operation is expected to invest at least $250 million. What kind of casino does that buy?

Christiansen: “It’s not going to buy you a palace. It’s not going to buy you a destination resort.” Such a casino would likely draw people from the region or from up to an hour drive away, he said.

Taxes

Casino operators are expected to pay 33 percent of their gross revenues to cities, counties and school districts, which is expected to amount to $650 million a year. Is this a fair tax rate and how does it compare to rates in other states?

Christiansen: A 33 percent rate is in the mid-range among jurisdictions that have legalized gambling in the last decade. Barrow called it a tad high and said non-traditional gaming states average about 23 percent.

Licensing fees

Each casino must pay a $50 million up front licensing fee to the state. Is that a fair price and could Ohio have gotten more if it had been bid out?

Barrow: “They probably could’ve gotten more.” Right now, based on the size of the facility, the licenses are going for $50 million to $100 million.

Christiansen, meanwhile, contends that license fees are unfair taxes that only take money away from the capital available to invest in the facility. License fees burden the casino with debt service and some gaming companies are balking at doing business in states where such fees are high, he said.

Personally I am not the one to judge how others spend their money, but if their going to spend it gambling I want it to stay in OHIO. Vote for Issue 3. Ohio needs jobs!
voter
1:09 PM, 10/26/2009
To Mike....your statements about how we Christians conduct our lives show you need prayer and I will pray for you.
J
12:29 PM, 10/26/2009
Personally, I oppose casinos but respect the rights of the voters to make the decision. The current Issue 3 is not in the best interest of all Ohio citizens. If the voters decide to allow casino gambling, it needs to be open so that ALL counties have the right to compete for them. Why do you think outside interests have been clamoring to locate in Ohio? Its because they see huge profits here. They should be taxed at 50% on everything. If not acceptable, don't locate here.
JT
12:16 PM, 10/26/2009
I am voting NO.
Travis Aker
11:56 AM, 10/26/2009
VOTE NO - gambling will only bring more crime and poverty to the state!! It will feed people's addictions and take away money from families (children!!) who need it more than some big casino boss. Vote this down!!
Non-Gambler
11:48 AM, 10/26/2009
There are 28 additional comments
SHOW ALL
We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.

The form has errors highlighted in red, please review these entries and try again!



Comments are limited to 500 characters


500 character limit

Incorrect please try again


These words come from scanned books.
Entering them helps digitize old texts.


Election results


Copyright © 2010 Hamilton Journal-News, Hamilton, Ohio, USA.All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. About our ads. You may wish to note our other business policies.