The Adobe Flash Player is required to view this multimedia interactive. Get it here.

Livestock, veteran amendments approved in Ohio

Complete election results

State jobless rate jumps to 10.5 percent
3:14 p.m.
Checkpoint tonight
2:04 p.m.
Man allegedly stabs self after fight with girlfriend
12:58 p.m.
Animal clinic collecting food to feed hungry family pets
12:37 p.m.
Holiday tree lighting tonight
12:25 p.m.
> More headlines

By Ben Sutherly, Staff Writer Updated 2:53 AM Wednesday, November 4, 2009

In an unofficial landslide, Ohio voters approved constitutional amendments that authorize creation of a livestock care standards board and bonuses to veterans of the Persian Gulf, Afghanistan and Iraq wars.

With 93 percent of precincts reporting statewide Tuesday, Nov. 3, Issue 2 (the livestock care commission amendment) was passing 64 percent to 36 percent. Issue 1 (veterans compensation) was passing 72 percent to 28 percent.

The Issue 2 vote shows Ohioans feel a state livestock care standards board is the right way to make decisions about farm animal care, supporters said.

Farmers mobilized strongly for the most serious issue facing agriculture since a pesticide labeling issue arose in the 1990s, said Jack Fisher, executive vice president of the Ohio Farm Bureau Federation, which supported Issue 2.

“We are committed to make this work,” Fisher said. He hopes the board is seated by spring 2010.

Spending by Issue 2 supporters far outstripped that by opponents. As of Oct. 22, the “Yes for Issue 2” campaign had spent $2.81 million of $3.61 million raised so far. Food & Water Watch, part of an opposition group called Ohio Against Constitution Takeover, reported spending about $6,300 through Oct. 22 to defeat Issue 2.

That made the outcome a virtual certainty, said Joe Logan of the Ohio Environmental Council, which opposed Issue 2.

“We’re going to work as hard as we can to try to create some measure of balance on this board,” Logan said. “I’m not sure if that’s doable. I think it’s a foregone conclusion that this board will be in favor of what agribusiness wants.”

Opponents have called the amendment a “power grab” by the state’s agribusiness interests that doesn’t belong in the state constitution.

Backers of the amendment have said it’s a more comprehensive approach to animal care than ballot initiatives put before voters in other states by the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) that address livestock care in a piecemeal fashion.

HSUS said in a prepared statement that Issue 2 was an attempt to block real reform and strongly hinted that it will pursue its own constitutional amendment to phase out certain animal housing practices.

With approval of Issue 1, the Ohio Department of Veterans Services estimated payments to eligible veterans should start going out in about a year.

Share this article

ADD COMMENT

Comments feed

The results of Issue 2 stink. Now the Humane Society or PETA cant police these guys when they abuse animals. Thats just plain wrong.

Josh
7:42 PM, 11/7/2009

REPORT ABUSE

I have to say that after reading what issue 2 is really about I think all of those commercials on it were very misleading. Thats the problem with America today. Its so aggravating the media can dish out any BS and never be accountable for it. Look at the elections both sides accuse each other of being criminals and no investigations are ever done. Even if they are lying about each other its still a crime and who wants a liar running your country.

TKidding
9:55 PM, 11/4/2009

REPORT ABUSE

According to the Ohio EPA, the state has close to 200 factory farms, including four beef operations with more than 3000 animals, 27 hog operations with more than 3000 animals, 29 dairy operations with more than 1000 animals, and a
staggering 98 poultry and egg-laying operations with more than 100,000 birds each, including 9 with more than a million birds.
from Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, “Map of permitted livestock facilities in Ohio,” prepared June 13, 2008

daisy
4:52 PM, 11/4/2009

REPORT ABUSE

local farmer 2: I respect you, really. I would like nothing more than local farmers - humane livestock farmers, with clean environments from farm to table, to provide our food. Everyone thinks a PETA group or the Humane Society could come in and tell you how to farm. But it doesn't/hasn't worked that way. Changes in livestock care in other states has been done by ballot initiative or propositions, where the VOTER votes, not a board comprised mostly of big-agribusiness interests.

local consumer
4:49 PM, 11/4/2009

REPORT ABUSE

how do you expect a state whom cannot even balance a budget control our food re: USDA. More control, less freedom, higher food prices........

meat eater
4:37 PM, 11/4/2009

REPORT ABUSE

There are 35 additional comments

SHOW ALL

We welcome your comments. Please remember this is a public forum and behave appropriately. Your comments must conform to our visitor's agreement.