2012 West Carrollton graduation
Home of the Week
Madison graduation 2012
Home > Blogs > Springfield Schools News and Issues > Archives > 2010 > June > 24 > Entry
Southeastern board moves toward November ballot
Southeastern board members approved today, June 24, the first of two necessary resolutions to place a bond issue before voters on the Nov. 2 ballot.
The board unanimously approved at a special meeting a resolution of necessity to put a 37-year, $7,983,000 bond issue on the November ballot, said Superintendent David Shea. The bond issue, if approved, would fund half the costs of a building project; the Ohio Schools Facilities Commission would fund 50 percent of the project.
The board will meet July 20 to complete the process of placing the bond issue on the ballot.
Comments
By Cmon Man
June 24, 2010 3:28 PM | Link to this
7:00 am board meeting? Hum so the public could not have a say. Unanimous huh, less than 12 months when running some were not supportive of this measure. What changed? voter revolt vote no
By Shirley
June 24, 2010 3:42 PM | Link to this
Didn’t know we needed new schools? Voting no.
By no way jose
June 24, 2010 4:00 PM | Link to this
Wow….they had to hide from the public in the early am…. no..no..no..
By no way jose
June 24, 2010 4:00 PM | Link to this
Wow….they had to hide from the public in the early am…. no..no..no..
By no way jose
June 24, 2010 4:00 PM | Link to this
Wow….they had to hide from the public in the early am…. no..no..no..
By no way jose
June 24, 2010 4:00 PM | Link to this
Wow….they had to hide from the public in the early am…. no..no..no..
By Parent
June 27, 2010 12:43 AM | Link to this
Yeah right!! Again the board is running this school again!! But thats right, we have the board to make those choices for us?? BUT its got to pass first! Not with my vote!!
By Parent
June 27, 2010 12:45 AM | Link to this
Yeah right!! Again the board is running this school again!! But thats right, we have the board to make those choices for us?? BUT its got to pass first! Not with my vote!!
By Parent
June 27, 2010 5:01 PM | Link to this
A new school is needed. What a great oppertunity.
By toddbanion
June 27, 2010 8:06 PM | Link to this
Without sounding like a bully no new school.
By Craig Isaac
June 27, 2010 9:48 PM | Link to this
Half price for a new facility that will educate our children and their children, and their children…….. Yes vote seem logical to me.
By Tojo
June 27, 2010 9:56 PM | Link to this
Can’t think of a single reason to vote no on this one. YES - YES- YES
By FDavis
June 27, 2010 10:48 PM | Link to this
Hard sell! We will require all the particulars. I think this will feel the negative thoughts of parents who disagreed with the moving of the 7th and 8th grade students to the high school just to make this possible.
By LB
June 28, 2010 3:32 PM | Link to this
I like how some of the people who leave pro school comments are people who live outside the district and open enroll their kids. They aren’t going to get their taxes raised. VOTE NO!
By Question for LB
June 29, 2010 9:27 AM | Link to this
Who are you talking abut LB? All “pro levy” comments on this page were from folks that live in the district?
By Livinbythehighschool
July 10, 2010 4:01 PM | Link to this
I will not vote for this one whats gonna happen to the high school is sam macadow gonna buy it just what i want rottin pallets falling into my yard oh and illigal workers trying to pick up my daughter befor she turns 13 oh ya
By JeffB
July 12, 2010 10:33 AM | Link to this
Livinbythehighschool - nice job throwing some nonfactual information out there for the public to latch on to. Mabe the purpose of the change in location is to get the students at the HS away from you and your family.
By good grief!
July 20, 2010 5:49 PM | Link to this
Just like our board to resort to personal attacks when they get their backs against the wall.Boy am I proud! NOT!Just what our town needs..trash talk to go along with the trash.
By BNB
July 27, 2010 6:28 PM | Link to this
As individuals the people on the SE Board are OK. As a group they out of touch with what this community wants and needs. SE Board is ignoring the survey they commissioned. They are getting very poor advice from Treasurer and non-resident Supt. Bottom line is that new schools are not needed, fix what we have, like community told you. Second, moving 7th/8th was a very bad decision - educationally unsound, and you had to sneak it through without community notification and input. You are/have killed any trust with parents and voters – it will be very hard to get it back, very sad!
By Dead IntheWater
October 29, 2010 1:29 PM | Link to this
Polling has 70 to 80% saying no way no how. WE THE PEOPLE have a say, not the elite minority! Because of this we may never get levy passed again in SE = Sad.
By don
April 25, 2011 8:20 AM | Link to this
Every other school that has taken the state’s 1/2 cost of the building of a new school can not now afford them, look at London, real trouble there. We don’t want that at Southeastern. No to the new school. I will vote yes for the Renewal levy to run our current school because that is what I am already paying and is in the budget. No to the new school.