Home > Blogs > Ohio politics > Archives > 2010 > September > 12 > Entry
Secretary of state candidate overstates number of lawsuits inherited from Ken Blackwell over 2004 presidential election
Quote: “It’s factually correct to say” that Jennifer Brunner inherited at least 18 lawsuits when she came into the office that were a result of Ken Blackwell’s “mismanagement of the 2004 election.” Maryellen O’Shaughnessy on Aug. 16 in a radio interview
Maryellen O’Shaughnessy was spot on when she said recently Ohio secretaries of state are judged on their handling of presidential elections.
O’Shaughnessy, a Democrat running for secretary of state this November, then slammed Republican Ken Blackwell for mishandling the 2004 presidential election when he held the office. Republican state Sen. Jon Husted, of Kettering, is O’Shaughnessy’s opponent this year.
“It’s factually correct to say that Ken Blackwell had at least 18 lawsuits that were even carried over that Jennifer Brunner inherited when she came into the office as a result of his mismanagement of the 2004 election,” O’Shaughnessy said in an Aug. 16 interview with WPKO/WBLL in Bellefontaine after a speech to local Democrats.
Brunner, a Democrat, was elected in November 2006 to succeed Blackwell after he lost a gubernatorial bid that year. O’Shaughnessy told the radio station that, if elected, she would maintain the stability Brunner brought to the office.
O’Shaughnessy’s comments put her on a long list of Democrats to criticize Blackwell. We wanted to check out her claim and asked her campaign for information about the lawsuits. A spokeswoman pointed to a letter Brunner wrote The Columbus Dispatch and a separate news story that appeared in The Daily Record, of Wooster.
In a letter to the Dispatch published Feb. 18, 2007, Brunner said 21 lawsuits were pending when she took office. She did not say how many were related to the 2004 presidential election. The Daily Record story, published April 5, 2007, also said 21 lawsuits were pending when Brunner took office. The story made no mention of the 2004 presidential election.
The portion of O’Shaughnessy’s statement that said Brunner inherited “at least 18 lawsuits” seemed solid. But there was no proof, within the evidence O’Shaughnessy’s office provided - that those lawsuits were related to the 2004 presidential election.
We checked with Brunner’s office, which provided a comprehensive list of all cases that Brunner inherited from Blackwell. It is not specific to the 2004 presidential election, Brunner spokesman Patrick Gallaway said. The list, last updated in January, shows Brunner inherited 18 cases when she took office, including one settled during Blackwell’s term with unpaid fees.
Court documents showed 10 of the 18 cases are related to Blackwell’s administration of the 2004 presidential election. The others dealt with a myriad of issues, including campaign finance law and the use of electronic voting machines.
To their credit, the O’Shaughnessy campaign acknowledged she was incorrect after we shared the records from Brunner’s office with them.
“She misspoke about the ones that relate to 2004,” spokeswoman Heidi Hubmann said. O’Shaughnessy clearly jumped to an inaccurate conclusion about Blackwell’s job performance in the radio interview. Her sources of information, two newspaper articles from 2007, do not support the meat of her claim - that Blackwell’s mismanagement of the 2004 election led to at least 18 lawsuits that landed in Brunner’s lap. Brunner’s records show that’s not true.
We rate the statement False.
What is PolitiFactOhio?
Several times a week, the Dayton Daily News will publish content from PolitiFactOhio to help you be more informed as a citizen and a voter.
PolitiFact Ohio is a partnership of The (Cleveland) Plain Dealer and PolitiFact.com.
PolitiFactOhio investigates comments from public figures and runs their claims through the “Truth-O-Meter.”
The comments are fact checked and then ranked as true, mostly true, half true, barely true and false. If someone has gone off the deep end, we will rank their statements as “pants on fire.”
Read past PolitiFactOhio stories, see how politicians rate in previous Truth-O-Meter rulings. PolitiFactOhio.com
Permalink | Comments (7) | Post your comment | Categories: PolitiFactOhio
Tweet
Comments
By autism symptoms
December 19, 2010 1:52 PM | Link to this
Great site. A lot of useful information here. I’m sending it to some friends!
By Wordpress Themes
September 22, 2010 1:50 AM | Link to this
Amiable brief and this mail helped me alot in my college assignement. Gratefulness you seeking your information.
By Squirrellygirl
September 13, 2010 12:41 PM | Link to this
Don’t forget that Strickland stood behind Brunner in refusing to investigate the 200,000+ false Ohio votes during last presidential election. That’s right, Brunner allowed those 200,000 votes without investigating them which was her job, and Strickland stood behind Brunner in not doing her job. What do you say WE DO OUR JOB AND VOTE THESE CREEPS OUT OF OFFICE!
By rm miamisburg
September 12, 2010 5:04 PM | Link to this
Heck I worked the Polls one years and saw where Orville and Wibur Wight have been voting for years..Gee to think a Dem would LIE about her job. I would say Sad State of things, but with Dems that is Normal.
By BRUNNER & ACORN
September 12, 2010 2:38 PM | Link to this
“She is going to maintain the stability that Brunner brought to office”????? Brunner and her affiliation with acorn and voter fraud in the 2008 election was outrageous. She broke the law when she refused to verify thousands of new voters whose registration did not match county records and provide counties with the names of these voters. She refuses to take deceased people of the rolls, even though they had cast ballots. Then she states it is a waste of time to look into voter fraud…..Basically, she has refused to safeguard the legitimacy of the elections for Ohioans……but she has spent millions of dollars on bilingual voter ballots to protect the voting rights of ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!!!!!! GIVE ME A BREAK…..why isn’t the DDN reporting on her criminal actions in 2008????????????
By BRUNNER & ACORN
September 12, 2010 2:38 PM | Link to this
“She is going to maintain the stability that Brunner brought to office”????? Brunner and her affiliation with acorn and voter fraud in the 2008 election was outrageous. She broke the law when she refused to verify thousands of new voters whose registration did not match county records and provide counties with the names of these voters. She refuses to take deceased people of the rolls, even though they had cast ballots. Then she states it is a waste of time to look into voter fraud…..Basically, she has refused to safeguard the legitimacy of the elections for Ohioans……but she has spent millions of dollars on bilingual voter ballots to protect the voting rights of ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS!!!!!! GIVE ME A BREAK…..why isn’t the DDN reporting on her criminal actions in 2008????????????
By BClinton
September 12, 2010 12:23 PM | Link to this
I’ve taught them well, a true dem lies, and everyone acts surprised.