By seo lace

May 2, 2010 12:39 PM | Link to this

I van’t erad your site ni SeaMonkey 8.6, I jjust thougth I imbht let you know.

By seo lace

May 2, 2010 12:39 PM | Link to this

I am having a tuogh time seeing your blog ih Safari 6.8, I just thought I might let youh know?

By Buy Ambien

April 5, 2010 11:07 AM | Link to this

katell align rashmi emerge unreadable sized mice teddlie warehouse manner selves

By Buy valium

April 4, 2010 8:39 PM | Link to this

mulumnd djsa passed wsis february arteriolar insofar dbfkdbfk synthesize akhilesh sharon

By Dagwood

September 10, 2009 12:57 PM | Link to this

I think casinos are a great idea! We need more jobs to Ohio! UAW did the right thing!

By BigDude51

September 9, 2009 3:36 PM | Link to this

This is a great opportunity to bring jobs and economic development to our major cities. Yes on Issue 3.

By concerned

September 9, 2009 1:28 PM | Link to this

i didnt see any thing written on the issue 3 that made sacrificing our already dying ohio cities really benifit from this. dayton is a city of poor not able to afford a house community, thier education level boils on stupid.its a comunity of renters in broken houses that dont pass housing standards in most states. the good parts are where we own houses in englewood and other places like it are already praying that our jobs are still here tomorrow and me trying to find a job that no one legal is hiring anymore. do we really need to make more people poorer then they are already are shall we also make them homeless now and a gambing addiction on top of it? the gambing adds only show white people in the adds, why is that they dont show the poor black person or the white man about to lose everything? because we would all realize gambing can hurt our neighborhoods. us tax payers would lose. gambing is only good in states that can really afford the concenquenses that come with it and right now isnt the time. we would benifit more if they created a real legal business that doesnt led to gambing and could really grow our economy instead.if i wanted to gamble i already have plenty of places to go if i wanted to. we the people have to watch our wallets already. that is why i say what i do on this.

By Tim

September 9, 2009 12:41 PM | Link to this

My guess is that the plan is to staff the casino with union employees. Otherwise they wouldn’t be endorsing it.

By Fred

September 9, 2009 11:45 AM | Link to this

The people in Indiana are very happy with their casinos. It is documented in a series of reports written by the Center for Urban Policy and the Environment. They studied the social and economic impact of the casinos. Take a look: http://www.in.gov/igc/2361.htm

By inquiring mind

September 9, 2009 10:39 AM | Link to this

Yes to Casinos (even though I will never set foot in one), but no to any union involvement in their construction or day-to-day operations!

By Travis Aker

September 9, 2009 10:25 AM | Link to this

No to casinos

By Matt

September 9, 2009 9:56 AM | Link to this

Of course they endorse it, so they can weasel their way in to set up “Union” casino’s and then come up with a contract to make the casino’s unprofitable… another great union idea… morons