Thurgood Marshall graduation 2012
Badin vs. Versailles
Law Enforcement Memorial Day
Home > Blogs > Chatterbox > Archives > 2010 > June > 05 > Entry
Are 3-D movies worth the higher ticket price?
Are 3-D movies worth the higher ticket price?
JESSICA HOLLAND, Huber Heights: “I’ve only seen one movie in 3-D — ‘Avatar.’ I saw it in 2-D, too, and the 3-D was really nice. Movie prices are expensive anyway. I suppose 3-D is worth a few extra dollars.”
MARK LYTLE JR., Springfield: “No. I’ve not seen any 3-D movies, but I honestly don’t see what the big deal is. It’s the same exact movie. It’s not going the be that big until you can bring it into your house. I did see ‘Avatar’ — at my house, not in 3-D.”
EMMIE WENZELL, Enon: “I think it was worth the extra price, because the 3-D engulfs the viewer. I saw ‘Avatar’ in 3D, and it really brought out the special effects, which would have been just OK otherwise. The new 3-D also makes it a better HD picture. The image is crisper.”
CARRIE SCHAGEL, New Lebanon: “I think the 3-D movies are a neat concept, but I’m not willing to pay that price to go see them.”
SARAH OLSEN, Dayton: “It depends on the movie. I saw ‘Avatar’ in 3-D, and I liked it. It made you feel like you were kind of part of the movie.”
AMANDA ISAAC, Springfield: “I don’t think it’s worth the higher ticket price. I saw ‘Avatar’ in 2-D; it might be more interactive in 3-D, but I wouldn’t pay more to have to wear the little glasses. They make me sick; I get kind of motion sickness. I think little kids would enjoy it more in 3-D.”
Permalink | Comments (1) | Post your comment | Categories: Entertainment
Comments
By 3d is seedy
June 7, 2010 5:05 PM | Link to this
Nah, nada, nyet