Badin vs. Versailles
Law Enforcement Memorial Day
American Idol 2012 finale
Home > Blogs > Celebrity Worship > Archives > 2009 > July > 14 > Entry
Report: Debbie Rowe gives up MJ’s kids for $4 million
UPDATE:
Debbie Rowe’s lawyer tells People.com that reports that she’ll give up rights to her children for $4 million are bogus. “There has been no agreement reached between Ms. Rowe and the Jacksons,” says lawyer Eric George wrote in a statement reported on People.com. “Ms. Rowe has not accepted and will not accept any additional financial consideration beyond the spousal support she and Michael personally agreed to several years ago.”Earlier ….
In today’s sick MJ news, The New York Post has reported that Debbie Rowe has sold her kids to Michael Jackson’s mother.
The newspaper reports that Michael Jackson’s not-so-attractive-in-the-face ex-wife has agreed to drop her bid for parental rights in exchange for $4 million.
Isn’t that just wonderful. No.
The deal has apparently been sealed in a Los Angeles court. Let’s just hope this story isn’t true. As a general rule people shouldn’t go around selling and buying kids, even cute royal ones.
Debbie Rowe bore Prince Michael Joseph Jackson, 12, and Paris Michael Katherine Jackson, 11, for the King of Pop.
His 7-year-old “Blanket” Prince Michael Jackson II was conceived by vitro.
There has been speculation that Rowe is not the natural mother of the two oldest kids.
Katherine Jackson, perhaps the most sane Jackson, has temporary custody of all three of her son’s kids.
This isn’t the first time Rowe has agreed to buzz off for cold hard cash.
Rowe reportedly gave up custody of the kids when she divorced Jackson in 1999. As part of the settlement, she received $8 million and a house in Beverly Hills. She terminated her parental rights in 2001.
Rowe came back into the picture during Michael Jackson’s child molestation case. For the second time, she agreed to give Jackson full custody of the kids.
That time, MJ gave her $4 million and a $900,000 house in exchange, the UK Sun reports.
Permalink | Comments (16) | Post your comment | Categories: inked deals
Comments
By smith
July 14, 2009 1:22 PM | Link to this
I kind of hope it’s true. I’d like to see her go away once and for all. A woman who has already signed herself away twice for money just needs to be out of the picture forever. If this seals the deal and gets rid of her, I’m all for it.By lw
July 14, 2009 2:04 PM | Link to this
She never had any intentions on keeping those kids if she was awarded custody. It was all to get the money. Sad, very sad. My kids are priceless!By ugh
July 14, 2009 2:09 PM | Link to this
Almost sounds like some sort of extortion from the Jackson family. She shouldn’t be the mother anyway. The Jackson family is who those children know to be their family.By Evan
July 14, 2009 2:18 PM | Link to this
Micheal should have not had children period, he should have just “Beat it!”By Julie
July 14, 2009 2:41 PM | Link to this
People.com claims that this story isn’t true. No agreement/settlement has been reached.By OMG!
July 14, 2009 2:43 PM | Link to this
This low-life ugly lady is a user of the Jackson family. She has a dark and greedy soul. There are words that I wish to say about her. But, I can not put these words in print.By geez
July 14, 2009 3:03 PM | Link to this
I thought it was against the law to sell your children. If we would had sold ours we would be in jail. I think MJ’s mom is also in it for the money. Maybe the nanny should have them, she has raised them since birth.By Lisa
July 14, 2009 3:10 PM | Link to this
No matter how you look at it, those kids are the ones suffering. Their mother is nuts and their grandmother is too old to be raising them. Michael had plenty of siblings, one of them should step in.By amanda
July 14, 2009 3:44 PM | Link to this
although i am appaled that this story even came up i personally think that if the story is true she should be outcast just as she allegedly is outcasting her children .i am a mother of two wonderful boys and i coul dnever imagine leaveing my childrend for any reason let alone money . so needless to say i will pray this is not true , if it is i think she will get just deserts when her time comesBy geez
July 14, 2009 3:50 PM | Link to this
I think they are all half nuts and in it for the money. The kids would be better off out of that family.They are beautiful kids and should go to caring parents.By Pete
July 14, 2009 6:00 PM | Link to this
Amelia, you of all people should not make fun of another woman’s looks. There has to be at least one Jackson sibling who could give those children a good loving home.Keep them away from Papa Joe.By Tristen
July 14, 2009 6:08 PM | Link to this
Doesn’t seem to matter what side of the fence one stands on about Michael Jackon, but all reports have been that he was a great father and it shows. He and whoever helped him did a good job with those kids. They are said to be well behaved, very adjusted, and very mannerable. If Katherine can’t take care of the kids at some point, I think Aunt Janet would be a good choice. Just as Joe doesn’t have a hand in raising them. He already messed up their father emotionally.By Bill
July 14, 2009 9:21 PM | Link to this
Lisa….would you let Latoya raise your kidsBy lulu
July 14, 2009 9:44 PM | Link to this
janet seems to be the sanest sister…if you notice, she hasn’t spoken to the press at all. she seems to like her privacy, which is exactly what mj’s children need. did you hear that papa joe is trying to put together a tour for the kids? it’s sick.By derrikka
July 14, 2009 10:42 PM | Link to this
teh world has enough problems.the man rest in piece and his children michaelnever had a childhood.let,s do the reasonable thing and leave his family alone.By jean
July 15, 2009 6:16 PM | Link to this
some of us are sick of hearing about m jackson. what did he ever do ever do for his country? I have never read where any of the jackson children were in any branch of the armed service or risk their rich rears to entertain the troops.