Latest featured videos from Journal-News.com
Traditional marriage preference - The Data | Butler County News and Issues
 

Home > Blogs > Butler County News and Issues > Archives > 2009 > April > 01 > Entry

Traditional marriage preference - The Data

When this article ran about a proposed, controversial policy in Butler County Children Services — which gives preference to married couples over single or gay parents in foster or adoption cases — one comment surfaced more than any other from readers:

Where is the data?

This is one of the challenges of covering ongoing stories: we have to give enough background to put things in context, but can’t retell every story leading up to the most recent one.

This paper, to date, is the only news agency that has actually asked for the data. You can find that in this story. An excerpt:

When asked for that data, Fox produced a series of studies conducted by the Family Research Council, which describes itself on its Web site as “as an organization dedicated to the promotion of marriage and family and the sanctity of human life in national policy,” including “combating the homosexual agenda.”

Citizens for Community Values uses the exact same studies. Here is the research they cite. All of the Mapping America studies come from the Family Research Council, here is their Web site.

State lawmakers sent their letters to county commissioners after being contacted by the CCV.

I am not saying there is anything right or wrong with these studies. CCV officials argue that the Family Research Council’s data is scientific and reliable, regardless of its agenda. I am just saying that this is the data Michael Fox and the CCV are referring to.

Permalink | Comments (8) | Post your comment | Categories: Children Services

Comments

By Rob

April 1, 2009 10:46 AM | Link to this

Josh, thanks for the background. After looking at your research, though - I would suggest the “data” is particularly unconvincing in that it completely neglects other significant statistical cohorts in positing explanations. For example, median household income. You could “unpeel” some of the labels the FRC put on their data (like “married parents in an intact household” and “single parent”) and put the income labels on, and you’d have had the exact same chart. I would think getting at the causal relationship bewteen data and successful children is more important than coincidental “cherry picking” of convenient data points.

By Steve L

April 1, 2009 11:51 AM | Link to this

from frc’s website: Family Research Council (FRC) champions marriage and family as the foundation of civilization, the seedbed of virtue, and the wellspring of society. FRC shapes public debate and formulates public policy that values human life and upholds the institutions of marriage and the family. Believing that God is the author of life, liberty, and the family, FRC promotes the Judeo-Christian worldview as the basis for a just, free, and stable society.

By Steve L

April 1, 2009 12:00 PM | Link to this

How is that in anyway an unbiased source of information? These people are a joke.

By It's No Wonder that Hamilton and Middletown are Failing.

April 1, 2009 1:21 PM | Link to this

It’s narrow mindedness like this that will forever keep Butler County struggling to retain progressive, intelligent companies and people, let alone in its efforts to recruit any to this area. If Fox used data like this throughout his career – and his many, many government paid junkets out West, then it’s no wonder he and his staff failed so miserably in their attempts. And, as far as CCV, isn’t that group led by a recovering porn addict who admittedly can divine what porn is without even looking at it? Sorry, perceptions of this county are bad enough. Giving these clowns airtime only exacerbates it.

By Rich

April 2, 2009 9:21 AM | Link to this

Are Butler County “officials” so dim, so ignorant, and so oblivious that they don’t realize you can’t expect to get reliable data or analysis from admittedly biased sources? Do any of them believe for one second that CCV or FRC would conclude that “non-traditional” households could EVER be suitable as foster or adoptive homes? Of course not. OF COURSE NOT. Reliable, unbiased studies HAVE been conducted, and I cited just one in a comment posted to the earlier blog item on this subject. Just go to the American Academy of Pediatrics website and search for “same sex adoption” on their own search engine. You’ll quickly find this: pediatrics.aappublications.org/cgi/reprint/109/2/341 And please excuse repeating myself, but here is the operative section: “ABSTRACT. A growing body of scientific literature demonstrates that children who grow up with 1 or 2 gay and/or lesbian parents fare as well in emotional, cognitive, social, and sexual functioning as do children whose parents are heterosexual. Children’s optimal development seems to be influenced more by the nature of the relationships and interactions within the family unit than by the particular structural form it takes.” They cite sources, provide data, and are quite evidently NOT coming at this topic with an agenda of supporting one side or the other based on ulterior motives; rather, they are all about doing what is demonstrably RIGHT for children. I have no illusions that our “leaders” in Butler Co. will actually do the right thing in this case — they’ve proven themselves craven politically-driven cowards too many times in the past. It should surprise no one when they follow the same pattern in future. We can only hope that officials with more sanity in Columbus overrule our local “leaders” and quickly nullify this policy. If not, we’ll just have to wait for the inevitable court case that achieves this end, after wasting way too much public money and harming kids who could have had stable, nurturing homes far earlier.

By Big Momma

April 2, 2009 10:33 AM | Link to this

What I can’t get over is Don Dixon lecturing people about the importance of the “traditional married Family”. If there was ever a hypocrite, he’s the world biggest.

By Robert

April 2, 2009 10:38 AM | Link to this

It’s interesting and very telling that the commissioners are going to pay the next director of Children Services so much less than they paid Mike Fox. Clearly the big pay to less than qualified Fox was a payoff from the commissioners just to keep his mouth shut.

By Robert

April 4, 2009 9:56 AM | Link to this

Looks like our dim-witted Butler Co. officials got caught using bad science to further their backwards agenda, rather than using good science to promote the well-being and safety of Butler County’s children.

Post a comment



Remember me?




*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
Home | News | Sports | Entertainment | Opinion | Life | Recreation | Jobs | Cars | Homes
Advertising Media Kit | Online Ad Studio | Advertiser Tools | Customer Service | Our Partners | RSS | Site Map

Copyright © 2009 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.

This website is ACAP-enabled