Latest featured videos from Journal-News.com
Is the American conservative movement in trouble? | Book Nook
 

Home > Blogs > Book Nook > Archives > 2009 > August > 30 > Entry

Is the American conservative movement in trouble?

I have been getting some e-mails from readers today with comments about my book review that ran in the newspaper this morning. Here is the review:

“The Death of Conservatism” by Sam Tanenhaus, (Random House, 123 pages, $17)

Political movements are cyclical. The Reagan Revolution of the 1980s signified the high water mark for a conservative political movement that first tasted power with the election of President Richard M. Nixon in 1968.

Sam Tanenhaus believes the election of President Barack Obama was facilitated by a decline in the vitality of American conservatism. He offers a pithy overview of the American conservative movement over the past 50 years in his book “The Death of Conservatism.”

Tanenhaus fears that “Classical conservatives have all either deserted the Right or been evicted from it.” What is the matter here? He explains: “Some see this as a triumph. The Right has been proved wrong, and that can only be good. But America needs a serious, rigorous opposition. Skeptics and outsiders perform a vital function in a democracy. It is they who ask the most uncomfortable questions, who gaze most critically at the existing arrangements of our politics and culture.”

Even so, the author sees this as a moment of great opportunity for revitalizing the conservative movement because “the nation has entered a conservative phase, perhaps the most conservative since the Eisenhower years.” So how does he think the conservative movement got off track?

Tanenhaus asserts that “it was disappointment with (Ronald) Reagan and anger at the presumed betrayals of his successor, George H. W. Bush — chosen by Reagan himself — that fed the bitterness of the 1990s, when conservatism entered its most decadent phase.”

How the mighty have fallen. The once powerful congressman Tom DeLay is appearing in televised dance contests. The author opines that DeLay “tried to delegitimize a popular president, Bill Clinton, and assembled a shadow government of lobbyists” — these actions typified the sort of rot that had set into the conservative movement.

Conservatives once accused Franklin D. Roosevelt of creating a “socialist” government. The author points out that “conservative opponents of Barack Obama have applied the epithet ‘socialism’ to his ambitious plans to exert greater federal control over health care and energy policy, even though the Bush administration, the most conservative in modern history, itself orchestrated a $700 billion bailout of Wall Street.”

This “socialist” slur is nothing new. Dwight Eisenhower was the moderate who wrested the Republican presidential nomination away from the conservative candidate, Ohio Sen. Robert A. Taft. According to the book, one disgruntled Taft supporter “grimly declared, ‘This means eight more years of socialism’.” He was referring to Eisenhower.

“The Death of Conservatism” makes some bold statements. In regard to Richard Nixon: “No modern president surpassed him in sheer ability — intellectual or political.”

And when looking at our current charged political atmosphere, the author states: “attempts to depict Barack Obama as a radical or socialist dissolve under the most rudimentary examination of the facts.”

Tanenhaus describes how Obama is approaching the myriad challenges that we are facing and that “these are the actions of a leader who, while politically liberal, is temperamentally conservative and who has placed his faith in the durability — and renewability — of American institutions.”

Vick Mickunas

Permalink | Comments (14) | Post your comment | Categories: booms and busts

Comments

By Blowfly

September 1, 2009 12:22 PM | Link to this

The single most effective way to defeat a political opponent is to put them in charge of something important. Conservatives are in trouble because they have been in charge for 8 years, now it’s the democrats turn to run the country in to the ground. I’m an Obama supporter and even I’m worried about the size of the federal deficit.

By Raoul

August 31, 2009 9:33 PM | Link to this

Enough about conservatives. They are irrelevant right now. Let’s talk about the liberal Democrats because they are in control, and they are saying and doing things that demand our debate. Paul Krugman now says that defecits saved the world. He has come full circle after playing Chicken Little about all the harm the conservatives have wrought in cutting taxes (which always increases tax revenues) and now says the 9 Trillion dollar defecit is okay now because it is still within the growth potential of the GNP. Huh? That’s the same argument conservatives used when running up the deficit. Only conservatives based it on policies that promote economic growth, while liberals are doing their best to destroy economic growth. Liberal politics should be our focus; not conservatives. Vick, why not do a book review that challenges the liberal perspective? It would be much more poignant and topical.

By irishguy

August 31, 2009 1:15 PM | Link to this

Quite true my friend. I heard a poll today said 57% of folks would like to vote out their current representitives. If that happened it’d send a powerful message to the rest of them. Maybe then they’d be a bit more responsive to we the people. I’m not holding my breath, since it’s quite a while ‘till election time…

By vick

August 31, 2009 1:10 PM | Link to this

Corruption is not the sole domain of any one party, Irish. I call’em like I see’em, regardless of D’s, R’s, C’s, L’s, etc.

By irishguy

August 31, 2009 1:06 PM | Link to this

Haha, Vick, I’m sure that’s what you said about Duke Cunningham or any other pol with an R after his name

By vick

August 31, 2009 12:49 PM | Link to this

Charlie “Just Feathering My Nest” Rangel?! Come on, Irish, he’s a fine example of “free marketeering!”

By irishguy

August 31, 2009 12:42 PM | Link to this

HL, it’s sad to say but both parties seem to have their share of hypocrites lining their pockets. Charlie Rangel D-NY, a tax cheat writing tax code, for one example. We’ll see how happy you are in 2010.

By Happy Liberal

August 31, 2009 8:32 AM | Link to this

It is only a matter of time before conservatives lose all of their power. They elect hypocrites and are only in it to line their own pockets. They do not care about their constituents and it is evident in the mess they have got the country in.

By honshul

August 30, 2009 11:52 PM | Link to this

Here are some rudimentary facts: During the campaign Mr. Obama (mentored by Frank Marshall Davis) said to judge him by the people around him. Carol Browner- energy and climate change czar- avowed sosialist, Van Jones- green jobs czar- self proclaimed communist radical revolutinary, Mark Lloyd- Chief diversity officer- who thinks there should be only public/government radio. Tanenhaus is off base here.

By Mark from St Paul

August 30, 2009 8:44 PM | Link to this

Remember Vick, as soon as you stop applauding movement conservatism, you become the enemy of movement conservatism. Just ask Kevin Phillips, John Cole, David Brock, Andrew Sullivan, Arlen Specter, Jim Jeffords….

By Miller

August 30, 2009 2:42 PM | Link to this

Sam Tanenhaus may be many things but he is not a conservative. A true conservative would not want to accomodate liberals the way Tanenhaus does.

By downsized

August 30, 2009 1:54 PM | Link to this

“Nothing is impossible for the man who doesn’t have to do it himself.”- A.H. Weiler To Mike W: “Get your facts first, then you can distort them how you please.”-Mark Twain

By vick

August 30, 2009 1:16 PM | Link to this

Mike, are you aware that Sam Tanenhaus is a conservative? That’s why he wants the conservative movement to recover and provide some opposition for the other side of the political spectrum.

By Mike W

August 30, 2009 11:39 AM | Link to this

Sam Tanenhaus is a jackass
Post a comment



Remember me?


Commenting on this blog is moderated. Your blog will wait in a queue for approval by an administrator.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
Home | News | Sports | Entertainment | Opinion | Life | Recreation | Jobs | Cars | Homes
Advertising Media Kit | Online Ad Studio | Advertiser Tools | Customer Service | Our Partners | RSS | Site Map

Copyright © 2009 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.

This website is ACAP-enabled