Latest featured videos from Journal-News.com
a president who is crazy about books! | Book Nook
 

Home > Blogs > Book Nook > Archives > 2009 > January > 19 > Entry

a president who is crazy about books!

A couple of years ago I interviewed Jenna Bush, one of George and Laura’s twin daughters. She was absolutely charming.

At the end of our interview I posed one final question. I wanted to know how this president’s daughter perceived George W. Bush. Jenna told me that her dad is really smart and that he reads a lot.

For the past eight years we have been hearing all about George W. Bush and his voracious reading habits. Do you believe it? Does he seem like a guy who reads a lot of books? President Bush claims to have read 95 books in 2006. Amazing…

Now it appears that we are getting a new president who is an absolute book nut. Barack Obama reads a lot. And he reads widely. Hooray for that.

Here’s the story from the New York Times:

January 19, 2009

BOOKS

From Books, New President Found Voice

By MICHIKO KAKUTANI

WASHINGTON — In college, as he was getting involved in protests against the apartheid government in South Africa, Barack Obama noticed, he has written, “that people had begun to listen to my opinions.” Words, the young Mr. Obama realized, had the power “to transform”: “with the right words everything could change -— South Africa, the lives of ghetto kids just a few miles away, my own tenuous place in the world.”

Much has been made of Mr. Obama’s eloquence — his ability to use words in his speeches to persuade and uplift and inspire. But his appreciation of the magic of language and his ardent love of reading have not only endowed him with a rare ability to communicate his ideas to millions of Americans while contextualizing complex ideas about race and religion, they have also shaped his sense of who he is and his apprehension of the world.

Mr. Obama’s first book, “Dreams From My Father” (which surely stands as the most evocative, lyrical and candid autobiography written by a future president), suggests that throughout his life he has turned to books as a way of acquiring insights and information from others — as a means of breaking out of the bubble of self-hood and, more recently, the bubble of power and fame. He recalls that he read James Baldwin, Ralph Ellison, Langston Hughes, Richard Wright and W. E. B. Du Bois when he was an adolescent in an effort to come to terms with his racial identity and that later, during an ascetic phase in college, he immersed himself in the works of thinkers like Nietzsche and St. Augustine in a spiritual-intellectual search to figure out what he truly believed.

As a boy growing up in Indonesia, Mr. Obama learned about the American civil rights movement through books his mother gave him. Later, as a fledgling community organizer in Chicago, he found inspiration in “Parting the Waters,” the first installment of Taylor Branch’s multivolume biography of the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

More recently, books have supplied Mr. Obama with some concrete ideas about governance: it’s been widely reported that “Team of Rivals,” Doris Kearns Goodwin’s book about Abraham Lincoln’s decision to include former opponents in his cabinet, informed Mr. Obama’s decision to name his chief Democratic rival, Hillary Rodham Clinton, as Secretary of State. In other cases, books about F. D. R.’s first hundred days in office and Steve Coll’s “Ghost Wars,“ about Afghanistan and the C.I.A., have provided useful background material on some of the myriad challenges Mr. Obama will face upon taking office.

Mr. Obama tends to take a magpie approach to reading — ruminating upon writers’ ideas and picking and choosing those that flesh out his vision of the world or open promising new avenues of inquiry.

His predecessor, George W. Bush, in contrast, tended to race through books in competitions with Karl Rove (who recently boasted that he beat the president by reading 110 books to Mr. Bush’s 95 in 2006), or passionately embrace an author’s thesis as an idée fixe. Mr. Bush and many of his aides favored prescriptive books — Natan Sharansky’s “Case for Democracy,” which pressed the case for promoting democracy around the world, say, or Eliot A. Cohen’s “Supreme Command,” which argued that political strategy should drive military strategy. Mr. Obama, on the other hand, has tended to look to non-ideological histories and philosophical works that address complex problems without any easy solutions, like Reinhold Niebuhr’s writings, which emphasize the ambivalent nature of human beings and the dangers of willful innocence and infallibility.

What’s more, Mr. Obama’s love of fiction and poetry — Shakespeare’s plays, Herman Melville’s “Moby-Dick” and Marilynne Robinson‘s “Gilead” are mentioned on his Facebook page, along with the Bible, Lincoln’s collected writings and Emerson’s “Self Reliance“ — has not only given him a heightened awareness of language. It has also imbued him with a tragic sense of history and a sense of the ambiguities of the human condition quite unlike the Manichean view of the world so often invoked by Mr. Bush.

Mr. Obama has said that he wrote “very bad poetry” in college and his biographer David Mendell suggests that he once “harbored some thoughts of writing fiction as an avocation.” For that matter, “Dreams From My Father” evinces an instinctive storytelling talent (which would later serve the author well on the campaign trail) and that odd combination of empathy and detachment gifted novelists possess. In that memoir, Mr. Obama seamlessly managed to convey points of view different from his own (a harbinger, perhaps, of his promises to bridge partisan divides and his ability to channel voters’ hopes and dreams) while conjuring the many places he lived during his peripatetic childhood. He is at once the solitary outsider who learns to stop pressing his nose to the glass and the coolly omniscient observer providing us with a choral view of his past.

As Baldwin once observed, language is both “a political instrument, means, and proof of power,” and “the most vivid and crucial key to identity: it reveals the private identity, and connects one with, or divorces one from, the larger, public, or communal identity.”

For Mr. Obama, whose improbable life story many voters regard as the embodiment of the American Dream, identity and the relationship between the personal and the public remain crucial issues. Indeed, “Dreams From My Father,” written before he entered politics, was both a searching bildungsroman and an autobiographical quest to understand his roots — a quest in which he cast himself as both a Telemachus in search of his father and an Odysseus in search of a home.

Like “Dreams From My Father,” many of the novels Mr. Obama reportedly admires deal with the question of identity: Toni Morrison’s “Song of Solomon” concerns a man’s efforts to discover his origins and come to terms with his roots; Doris Lessing’s “Golden Notebook” recounts a woman’s struggles to articulate her own sense of self; and Ellison’s “Invisible Man” grapples with the difficulty of self-definition in a race-conscious America and the possibility of transcendence. The poems of Elizabeth Alexander, whom Mr. Obama chose as his inaugural poet, probe the intersection between the private and the political, time present and time past, while the verse of Derek Walcott (a copy of whose collected poems was recently glimpsed in Mr. Obama’s hands) explores what it means to be a “divided child,” caught on the margins of different cultures, dislocated and rootless perhaps, but free to invent a new self.

This notion of self-creation is a deeply American one — a founding principle of this country, and a trope addressed by such classic works as “The Great Gatsby” — and it seems to exert a strong hold on Mr. Obama’s imagination.

In a 2005 essay in Time magazine, he wrote of the humble beginnings that he and Lincoln shared, adding that the 16th president reminded him of “a larger, fundamental element of American life — the enduring belief that we can constantly remake ourselves to fit our larger dreams.”

Though some critics have taken Mr. Obama to task for self-consciously italicizing parallels between himself and Lincoln, there are in fact a host of uncanny correspondences between these two former Illinois state legislators who had short stints in Congress under their belts before coming to national prominence with speeches showcasing their eloquence: two cool, self-contained men, who managed to stay calm and graceful under pressure; two stoics embracing the virtues of moderation and balance; two relatively new politicians who were initially criticized for their lack of experience and for questioning an invasion of a country that, in Lincoln’s words, was “in no way molesting, or menacing the U.S.”

As Fred Kaplan’s illuminating new biography (“Lincoln: The Biography of a Writer”) makes clear, Lincoln, like Mr. Obama, was a lifelong lover of books, indelibly shaped by his reading — most notably, in his case, the Bible and Shakespeare — which honed his poetic sense of language and his philosophical view of the world. Both men employ a densely allusive prose, richly embedded with the fruit of their reading, and both use language as a tool by which to explore and define themselves. Eventually in Lincoln’s case, Mr. Kaplan notes, “the tool, the toolmaker, and the tool user became inseparably one. He became what his language made him.”

The incandescent power of Lincoln’s language, its resonance and rhythmic cadences, as well as his ability to shift gears between the magisterial and the down-to-earth, has been a model for Mr. Obama — who has said he frequently rereads Lincoln for inspiration — and so, too, have been the uses to which Lincoln put his superior language skills: to goad Americans to complete the unfinished work of the founders, and to galvanize a nation reeling from hard times with a new vision of reconciliation and hope.

Permalink | Comments (9) | Post your comment | Categories: booms and busts

Comments

By nancy mellon

January 22, 2009 8:06 PM | Link to this

Vick, that was a beautiful post. I haven’t read Obama’s book but I think I will now. I am very glad to hear about Obama’s choices in his reading matter. What a wonderful selection of thoughts, he is filling his brain with. With all those great authors helping him, I feel more confident in his ability to think his way through the thickets that he is surrounded with. thanks, Nancy

By Mike

January 20, 2009 1:45 PM | Link to this

Well Vick, I have never made any bones about the fact that I thought Bush was a disastrous President. But I have no reason to doubt that he is an enthusiastic reader. It is interesting that The Times notes Bush preferred “prescriptive books”. I would think these types of books would tend to be more geared to expressing things like historical facts and their contextual aspects as they relate to more current events. Or they might deal more with theoretical subjects and issues. These types of books, while they might expand your knowledge base concerning specific subjects, do not necessarily contribute to a greater ability to analyze the nuances and subtleties of different ideas and viewpoints. The books that the author indicates Mr. Obama often chooses “has tended to look to non-ideological histories and philosophical works that address complex problems without any easy solutions, like Reinhold Niebuhr’s writings, which emphasize the ambivalent nature of human beings and the dangers of willful innocence and infallibility.” Regularly engaging yourself in these more esoteric types of writings lends to strengthening ones thought processes, challenges your abilities to reason and helps hone a broader sense of intellect. In other words, they teach you to think, not just to learn new facts. And that is where I believe the difference lies between Bush and Obama. Bush can be a voracious reader, yet never undertake something which challenges his mind and his intellect and forces him to weigh the legitimacy of different thoughts and ideas. And this constant challenging of ones mind is what leads to greater intellectual strength. Bush could read a book every day of his life. But if he never read anything which challenged his world view or caused him to take a deeper valuation of what he believes to be his core beliefs, then he could, in fact, remain very intellectually shallow and stunted. Reading, in and of itself, does not make one more intellectual. It’s how you exercise and challenge your brain through a variety of ideas and viewpoints that leads to intellectual strength. Not simply reading 95 books in year.

By lmj

January 19, 2009 5:18 PM | Link to this

I didn’t express my self well. Mr. Obama need not shill for any product - even books. I think that some, such as myself, will want to read what he is reading. Some will see a man, and yes, a black man, and say, “Hey! It’s cool to read.” I didn’t mean to induce a painful reminder of Mr. Dole as a pitchman. Yuck!

By Blowfly

January 19, 2009 2:32 PM | Link to this

I find it hard to believe that Bush reads much of anything given his disdain for anything/anyone academic or intellectual. There’s also the issue of time, even a bad president is busy. Obama actually talks about the books he’s read which is some evidence that he actually does read. I guess we can look for an Obama lead resurgence in books (and Jazz, he’s a big fan as well).

By irishguy

January 19, 2009 2:01 PM | Link to this

Vick, Maybe I’m a bit defensive. I didn’t agree with everything Mr Bush did, but it seems he’s attacked for everything. The author seems to say that he only read because of the competition. As if there was no enjoyment or desire to be informed on issues. As far as the sarcasm, I thought i was just repeating Mr Obama’s campaign promises;-)

By vick

January 19, 2009 1:39 PM | Link to this

Where did I say that George W. Bush is stupid? I didn’t say that GW is dumb. Perhaps you thought I was employing sarcasm, Irish? You certainly are dripping with sarcasm about Obama…

By irishguy

January 19, 2009 12:58 PM | Link to this

I don’t know why it’s so hard to believe W is so well read. He’s got an Ivy League MBA, was a fighter jet pilot and a governor. Achievements that require more than average intelligence. He’s certainly not the best public speaker around, which, I assume, is what helps perpetuate the impression he’s not too bright. When their college records were released W actually got better grades than John Kerry. Can’t you lefties give any credit for anything? I’m sure Mr Obama will promote books as soon as he ends “global warming”, brings about global peace, universal health care, cures aids, and saves the world!

By vick

January 19, 2009 11:48 AM | Link to this

LMJ, Barack Obama could be a celebrity endorser of lots of products; books, his ubiquitous Blackberry, his brand of cigarettes,etc. But I don’t see it happening. I hope not. It was bad enough seeing a former Senator and presidential also-ran, Bob Dole, shilling for Viagra. That was simply too much…

By lmj

January 19, 2009 11:27 AM | Link to this

When I read this earlier this morning, Vick, I KNEW you had a blog subject. Maybe I can believe that Mr. Bush read 95 in 2006. He had to do something with his time. Yes, my politics are showing. After I read this article I was wondering if maybe Mr. Obama could rival Oprah as a bookseller. Wouldn’t it be wonderful if the President would promote books by announcing his book du jour? Do you think that might trickle down to people who don’t usually have a love of books?
Post a comment



Remember me?


Commenting on this blog is moderated. Your blog will wait in a queue for approval by an administrator.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
Home | News | Sports | Entertainment | Opinion | Life | Recreation | Jobs | Cars | Homes
Advertising Media Kit | Online Ad Studio | Advertiser Tools | Customer Service | Our Partners | RSS | Site Map

Copyright © 2009 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.

This website is ACAP-enabled