Latest featured videos from Journal-News.com
stay out of Bob Novak\'s way | Book Nook
 

Home > Blogs > Book Nook > Archives > 2008 > July > 26 > Entry

stay out of Bob Novak’s way

51r6aPd9swL._SL500_AA240_.jpg

Syndicated columnist Robert Novak didn’t notice when he hit an elderly, homeless man the other day. Novak’s Corvette wasn’t going that fast. According to some reports Novak was distracted. It seems that he was listening to National Public Radio.

According to the Washington Post:

“The homeless pedestrian who was struck by a car driven by syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak said in a radio interview yesterday that he is “doing fine,” recovering from a dislocated shoulder, and voiced surprise and amusement that the prominent political pundit was at the wheel of the Chevrolet Corvette that hit him.

“Bob Novak is the one that hit me?” said 86-year-old Don Clifford Liljenquist, sounding astonished when WMAL (630 AM) reporter Troy Russell told him that the driver was Novak. “Well, everybody knows who Bob Novak is! He’s a famous journalist! … I was struck by Bob Novak? … Well, I think that makes it a great story!”

Novak, 77, whose column appears in The Washington Post, has said that he did not know he hit Liljenquist until a bicyclist stopped him a short distance from the site of Wednesday morning’s incident, at 18th and K Streets NW. Speaking to the radio station by phone from his room at George Washington University Medical Center, Liljenquist did not dispute Novak’s account.

“Yeah, it’s possible that he didn’t know he hit me,” Liljenquist said. “The vehicle was moving at 10 miles per hour or something like that, and the driver might not have seen me, because I rolled off and fell down to the pavement. So, yeah, it’s possible that he didn’t see me. He wasn’t paying attention to his driving.”

Witnesses said Novak was driving his black 2004 Corvette convertible north on 18th near K when he struck Liljenquist, who was walking across 18th. David Bono, who was bicycling to his law office, said Liljenquist “went up on the hood, up on the windshield” and “rolled off the hood and landed on the street.”

Liljenquist, a resident of a homeless shelter, largely confirmed Bono’s account, though he repeatedly used a garbled word to describe a part of the Corvette.

“I had the right of way,” he said. “But an automobile was approaching on K Street. He just kept going… . His bumper run under me. And I did a maneuver. I rolled across his …”

He paused, until Russell finally said, “The hood of his car?”

Liljenquist continued, “Across his [unintelligible] and then fell down to the pavement.”

Bono and others said in interviews that they think Novak was attempting to flee the scene before Bono stopped him, but Novak said he did not know he had hit a pedestrian until Bono told him.

In any case, when D.C. police arrived, Novak’s car was stopped on the service road beside K Street, about a block from where Liljenquist was hit, so Novak was not charged with leaving the scene. An officer issued him a $50 traffic citation accusing him of failing to yield to a pedestrian. Police initially misspelled Liljenquist’s name and mistakenly gave his age as 66.

As for Liljenquist’s injuries, a Washington Post reporter went to his hospital room yesterday and saw him sitting on the side of his bed, his gray hair falling to his shoulders, talking with social workers. A relative said Liljenquist did not want to be interviewed.

Later, though, on WMAL, he said: “The doctors reset my shoulder. I’m doing fine… . I’m a pretty tough guy, you know. And when I saw I was being hit, I rolled with the punch. I used my training in judo to roll with the punch.”

He did not answer definitively when asked whether he is contemplating legal action against Novak.

“He’s a very good reporter,” Liljenquist said. “But as a driver, he wasn’t paying attention.”

Permalink | Comments (16) | Post your comment | Categories: booms and busts

Comments

By Mark from St Paul

July 29, 2008 3:04 PM | Link to this

It does now appear that Novak’s tumor could be responsible for his behavior. And I think it goes without saying that his drivers license should be taken away as he is no longer medically fit to drive. It’s hard to give up your drivers license, but it’s even harder on the pedestrians when people keep driving after they have gone into physical decline.

By TRS

July 28, 2008 6:07 PM | Link to this

Kind of mute point now but if Novak claimed he didn’t know he hit the guy, then how can he be fleeing a scene? Mark - perhaps your a better driver than I, but I’ve made turns and fortunately saw the pedestrian at the last minute - obviously Novak did not. Have you ever gone through an intersection and then wondered what color the light was? A distracted driver does some wacky things. Remember, the test in criminal law is reasonable doubt and sometimes the citations are based on that. Regardless, Prose is right - perhaps the recent diagnosis explains alot. I too wish both him and Senator Kennedy God speed. Ain’t none of us perfect.

By prose

July 28, 2008 3:44 PM | Link to this

Just saw the report telling of Robert Novak’s newly diagnosed brain tumor. This could explain his behavior. Not the policeman’s. Best wishes that it is benign and for a speedy recovery.

By Mark from St Paul

July 28, 2008 1:42 PM | Link to this

But that doesn’t add up because Novak was doing a right turn when he hit the pedestrian. How can you turn a car without looking to see where you’re going? Also the low-slung nature of the Corvette means that the pedestrian wouldn’t have slid onto the hood, he would have fallen on it as his feet were knocked out from under him. The only scenario I can envisage that would facilitate such a sequence of events would have been a driver on the phone, but even then I cannot understand how you could run “under” someone while turning without noticing. I believe Novak knew, and just kept on going. The cyclist who caught up with him was an attorney, and was absolutely certain that this was hit and run. The pedestrian cut Novak some slack, but the pedestrian was also a homeless bum whose mental acuity can be fairly questioned. The best witness is the cyclist who says the pedestrian crossed with the light, and that Novak just kept going after the accident occurred. Who Novak is isn’t really relevant to me. This is about the double standard of underticketed movers and shakers. Novak did a hit and run. If he truly didn’t know he hit someone, he’s not competent to drive and should have his license taken from him.

By TRS

July 28, 2008 12:51 PM | Link to this

A ‘Vette is low in the front and very steamlined, easy for someone to slide up the hood into the windshield. It also has alot of composite materials which make up the energy absorbing systems of the bumper and front end. Even at low speed such an impact still happens fast and the sound could be initially confused with hitting a speed bump or pothole, particularly if the driver is distracted. Pedestrians, like motorcyclists or bicyclists are often overlooked on the road - folks look right at them yet it just doesn’t register. Add to that being distracted and you have a scenario where Novak’s account is plausible. Per Vic’s notes, even the guy who was hit agreed with that. Apparently the DC police felt the same way. I’m not defending his actions and there’s no quetion he’s negligent. I certainly wouldn’t want to walk in front of him either but the facts don’t seem to point to some sort of felony hit/skip event or purposeful fleeing the scene and he wasn’t cited for that; rather, an older guy in a ‘Vette who wan’t paying proper attention to what he was doing.

By prose

July 28, 2008 11:47 AM | Link to this

As a former investigator TRS, would you have been interested in why the eyewitnesses believed Novak was fleeing the scene? Why wouldn’t the police give their stories the same credibility as Novak’s? Doesn’t the former investigator in you wonder why? If not, why not? As you say you have experience in these matters, please elaborate.

By Mark from St Paul

July 28, 2008 10:31 AM | Link to this

TRS, your Wikipedia points all come from Gary Wills book, The Kennedy Imprisonment: A Meditation on Power, 1st Mariner Books edition, Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. ISBN 0618134433. I haven’t read this book and those allegations are new to me. They’re also irrelevant to Novak’s case. I’d love to hear more about your history of accident investigation, and how people don’t always know when they’ve hit someone else. Did any of those cases involve a car moving forward at city speeds where the pedestrian rolled across the hood of the car? (You’re very good at changing the subject, btw.)

By TRS

July 28, 2008 12:01 AM | Link to this

From Wikipedia - “Kennedy was driven to the Ferry dock where he jumped into the water and swam the distance between Chappaquiddick and Marthas Vineyard Islands, some 500 feet, and returned to his room at the Shiretown Inn” and “Back at his hotel, Kennedy complained at 2:55 am to the hotel owner that he had been awoken by a noisy party.”. Seems you missed those details which you insinuated were made up. Novak was cited for Failure to Yield - a misdemeanor traffic citation, not a Hit and run felony. He stated he did not know he hit the pedestrian; thus, the reason for not going back and assisting. That sounds inplausible but in a former life I did vehicle investigations and its not unheard of. While the incidents were unrelated, the point was made in your last comment. You researched the facts on Kennedy but drew you own conclusions about Novak. Seems to me your only interest was in demonizing Novak and not determining the facts. Certainly your free to do that - just wanted to put it in perspective.

By prose

July 27, 2008 10:13 PM | Link to this

Sorry, if it seems like I’m piling it on TRS. But, I don’t have a quarter billion dollars and a few years to investigate the case. (ala. Whitewater)

By prose

July 27, 2008 10:09 PM | Link to this

Really appreciate your observations Mark. Sadly, TRS apparently represents the “law and order only when it suits them” cult of destruction, promulgated by the final solution cabal. These poor bastards have swallowed so much of Rove’s Kool-aid that they’ll likely be blaming Kennedy and Clinton for the space shuttle disaster, torture at Gitmo and problems with the Hubble telescope. In their world the economy is booming, we’ve finally brought peace and democracy to the Middle East, and Bush doing belly bumps with Air Force Academy grads helped to finally show the world he really DOES have class. Novak, I assume, passed a field sobriety test but I believe a blood test should have been administered at the jail. Who knows, he may have popped one of his chubby buddy’s old oxcycontins(sic).Oral solutions run strong in this tribe. They’re always so full of s…urprises. Even I never thought TRS could make a leap SO far back, SO far out, to smokescreen one of his own. Did they search the car for any smoking paraphernalia? You make a good point about the cell phone hazard. That left wing, commie radical Governor of California recently signed a ban for driving while using a cell phone. What’s happening to this country? It’s illegal to be a hazardous driver, smoke at work, and now those wackos in Congress are saying lying to go to war and torturing prisoners is wrong. What’s next oversight of executive pay at quasi-governmental entities?! Imagine the nerve of extracting 50 bucks from Robert for hitting a mere homeless guy. What was this poor person doing on K street anyway? He should stay in the shelter until he gets a job.

By Mark from St Paul

July 27, 2008 4:01 PM | Link to this

It would also be interesting to know if Bob Novak was on the phone when he flattened that senior citizen. I don’t know about Ohio, but here in Minnesota they keep trying to make it illegal to be on the phone while driving, but the wireless lobby keeps defeating every measure. Half the time I observe crummy driving, the driver is on the phone putting the public at risk so they can chat while driving. New studies show that drivers on the phone drive as poorly as if they’d been drinking.

By Mark from St Paul

July 27, 2008 3:55 PM | Link to this

It’s so much fun to argue with people whose side makes up their own facts. From Wikipedia: “Chappaquiddick received international notoriety in 1969, when the dead body of Mary Jo Kopechne was discovered inside an overturned car belonging to Senator Edward (Ted) Kennedy in a channel on the island. Kennedy did not report the incident until the following morning, and Kopechne’s body was later recovered from the submerged vehicle. Kennedy entered a plea of guilty to a charge of leaving the scene of an accident after causing injury and received a sentence of two months in jail, which was suspended.” Wisegeek elaborates: ” He also lost his license for a year, and personally paid $90,000 US Dollars (USD) to Ms. Kopechne’s family. He was investigated for more serious crimes related to the Chappaquiddick Incident, including a possible DUI, which could not be proven, and the potential that he or someone else had murdered Ms. Kopechne and deliberately driven off the bridge to hide her murder. Review of the known facts, and the Kopechne family’s refusal to exhume Ms. Kopechne’s body for further study halted such investigation.” Kennedy paid a high price for his actions and the truth of what happened that night does not reflect well on him. But true to form his most extreme political enemies manufactured an even worse case against him, foreshadowing the c**k and bull stories fed to the Scaife investigators in Arkansas. Chappaquiddick also has NOTHING TO DO WITH BOB NOVAK COMMITTING A HIT AND RUN FELONY. But if you really think Chappaquiddick informs Novak’s situation, then we also need to factor in Laura Bush blowing through a stop sign hitting and killing a former boyfriend she was angry at. Wikipedia’s version states “duated in 1968 with a Bachelor of Science degree in education. In 1963 she was involved in a car accident by running a stop sign and hitting another car, killing classmate Michael Dutton Douglas, who was driving the other car. According to the accident report released by the city of Midland, neither driver was drinking, and no charges were filed.” Sounds like the First Lady got even more preferential treatment than Ted Kennedy, who, it should be noted, has never shot someone in the face, unlike our incumbent Vice President but that also has nothing to do with the fact that a wealthy political hitman ran into a pedestrian who was crossing with the light, and failed to stop to render assistance, i.e., hit and run, a felony in all 50 states. And just to head off your next response, yes, Bill Clinton had an affair with an intern in the White House, but no, that also has nothing to do with THE FACT THAT BOB NOVAK RAN OVER A 66-YEAR OLD MAN AND DIDN’T STOP TO OFFER ASSISTANCE. Please try addressing the current crime instead of dredging up 39-year-old gotcha’s. Bob Novak should have spent the night in a DC jail just like any other criminal.

By TRS

July 27, 2008 3:11 PM | Link to this

Ah, yea, that would be the one who left the scene, swam back to his motel where he got a good night’s sleep (even complaining about a loud party in the middle of the night) and then reported the accident only after her body was discovered. Last I checked, I don’t think there is any age limit on owning a ‘Vette. Is he sorry? News article indicate his regret and he was cited for failure to yield. It seems Kennedy can be forgiven because he falls within the wheelhouse of some’s political views whereas Novak cannot, most likely because he is a conservative journalist. Seems to me they were both lousy drivers, but we’ll leave it to the less biased to decide whose actions were the most egregious.

By Mark from St Paul

July 27, 2008 11:05 AM | Link to this

That would be the Ted Kennedy who repeatedly dove back under the water trying to find Kopechne? And that compares to Bob Novak claiming he didn’t see the pedestrian who rolled across his hood in what way? Kennedy made mistakes and atoned for them. Where is the atonement in Novak’s actions? Hell, where in Novak’s story is there any sign of contrition? Is he at all sorry that he hit this guy? And what kind of senior citizen drives a black ‘vette?

By TRS

July 27, 2008 12:01 AM | Link to this

I’m wonder if Mary Jo Kopechne’s family would have similiar things to say about another preening, pompous, arrogant, self-righteous, braggert, legend-in-his-own-mind, “prince of crapness” Washington insider?

By prose

July 26, 2008 3:50 PM | Link to this

So, the preening, pompous, arrogant, self-righteous, braggert, legend-in-his-own-mind, “prince of crapness”, Novak commits another crime. This time striking some poor, homeless guy then, according to witnesses, tries to creep away from the scene. No surprise. This blowhard, who gave an assist to Cheney and the stormtroopers in outing Valerie Plamme, has been skulking around the laws for years. Without the witnesses present,I’m certain he’d be accusing the victim of throwing himself at his car in an attempt to fraudulently attempt to extort money. Or maybe charge the victim with assaulting his vehicle. Novak subscribes to the philosophy that everyone deserves what they get. In his case that would be rich and infamous. In the victims case poor, homeless and now hopitalized. He’ll shed no tears except perhaps for himself, afterall, he was fined a whole 50 bucks and the guy dented his “Vette”. It really doesn’t matter if Mr.Liljenquist sues, because Novak is probably already so lawyered up that Mr. L. would be in the legal process long after his or Novak’s natural life expectancy. The best he can hope for is a settlement. Isn’t that how all the rich, criminal, egotistical bastards, inside and abetting this administration always get off. Or maybe George W. can just pardon the pandering parasite. Lord knows George owes him, bigtime. Wouldn’t it be nice if just once this useless dung beetle got what was coming to him. Sorry, that was a terrible thing to say about a dung beetle.
Post a comment



Remember me?


Commenting on this blog is moderated. Your blog will wait in a queue for approval by an administrator.


*HTML not allowed in comments. Your e-mail address is required.

 
Home | News | Sports | Entertainment | Opinion | Life | Recreation | Jobs | Cars | Homes
Advertising Media Kit | Online Ad Studio | Advertiser Tools | Customer Service | Our Partners | RSS | Site Map

Copyright © 2009 Cox Ohio Publishing, Dayton, Ohio, USA. All rights reserved.

By using this site, you accept the terms of our Visitors Agreement and Privacy Policy. You may wish to note our other business policies.

This website is ACAP-enabled